vunLegal reads, reasons and drafts on Indian constitutional and rights law — grounded in a hand-authored corpus of the Constitution, its amendments, landmark judgments and the statutes that give them effect. Every claim carries its citation, or it does not get made.
Legal work runs on sources. The answer is usually already written down — in an article, a judgment, a statute, a client's own file — and the expensive part is finding it, knowing which one governs, and being able to stand behind it.
vunLegal is built for that. Ask in plain language and it assembles the provisions that actually bear on the question, ranks them by whether they govern or merely mention, and returns an answer where every line is traceable to its source.
It comes from vunai, an applied AI research lab. Retrieval and grounding — systems whose answers are tied to real sources rather than invented — is the work we already do for enterprises.
Ask what the law says and get a structured advisory — the governing provisions, the supporting authority, and the genuine ambiguities, each cited.
Put a letter, notice or contract in. Get a grounded verdict, the red flags, and the demands that follow — each tied to the provision behind it.
Legal notices and complaint skeletons assembled from the governing provisions, with placeholders where your facts go. Not a template — built from the law that applies.
A recommended route: which forum, which parallel remedies, how strong the case looks, and the authority behind each step.
See what amended a provision and which judgments interpret it, so you are reading the current position rather than the original text.
Load the client's documents and they become citable evidence alongside the law — facts and authority in the same answer.
A question in plain language, a letter to review, or a matter file to work from.
The provisions that bear on it, ranked by whether they govern the question or merely touch it.
An answer, a verdict or a draft — every line traceable to the source behind it.
Every citation is verified against the corpus before an answer is emitted. If it does not resolve, it is flagged — not printed. Provisions arrive ranked by whether they govern the question or merely touch it, each with a stated reason. Where the law is genuinely ambiguous, it says so instead of quietly picking a side.
Ask something outside its scope and it tells you, rather than inventing an answer that reads well.
QIs a non-renewal after a pregnancy disclosure lawful at a government PSU?
A government PSU is “the State” [Art 12], so the Constitution applies to it directly. A non-renewal timed to the disclosure [Doc: letter-0916] points to discrimination on grounds of sex [Art 15] and to arbitrary action [Art 14]. Statutory protection follows from [Maternity Benefit Act, s.12], and the internal service rule [PSU Service Rules 2019] could not be verified.
PSU Service Rules 2019 — outside the corpus, flagged not printed
An advisory answer in which each legal claim carries a citation. Four citations resolve against the corpus and are marked as grounded; one refers to a source outside the corpus and is flagged rather than presented as supported.
Built for the people whose day is spent establishing what a set of documents actually says.
You do not have to be a lawyer to try it. The form asks whether you are a legal professional so we know who we are building for, not to decide who gets in.
vunLegal has not launched yet. Leave your details and we will get in touch when the demo is ready — no obligation, and nothing to install in the meantime.
vunLegal is currently in development and is intended as an AI guidance tool; it does not replace professional legal judgment.